Lackawanna murder suspect found guilty of killing wife

BUFFALO, N.Y. (WIVB) – The jurors hearing the case against Daniel Whiting have found him guilty of 2nd degree murder.

Whiting was accused of stabbing his wife, Ashley, about 30 times last July while their two young children were in the room. Daniel and Ashley Whiting were both found with stab wounds, but police say they believe Daniel Whiting stabbing himself to make it look like another person was responsible.

Jurors listened to closing arguments from the prosecution and the defense Wednesday morning and were sent on a lunch break before returning for their instructions from the judge and to begin deliberations.

Defense attorney Andrew LoTempio presented his summation first, and called the investigation into question, saying investigators picked and chose specific pieces of evidence to test and analyze to back up their assumption from the beginning that Whiting had stabbed his wife.

Whiting has claimed a burgler was responsible. He has said he woke up to find that person, wearing a hooding and a bandana, stabbing his wife. He says he was stabbed in the struggle trying to fight the attacker off. LoTempio said a hand print on the outside of a window and blood patterns on the scene back that story up, and he went through several photos with the jury to try to make that point during his summation Wednesday.

The prosecution says Whiting’s story does not match with the forensic evidence, and said during closing arguments that Whiting stabbed himself and took steps like leaving a door unlocked to try to make investigators believe someone else was there. The prosecutor, Colleen Curtin Gable, pointed to inconsistencies in the stories Whiting told police as well as forensic evidence and testimony from Whiting’s fellow inmates as she laid out the case against Whiting.

The prosecution claimed they have proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Daniel Whiting caused Ashley Whiting’s death and that he killed her intentionally, the two criteria for a 2nd degree murder conviction.

The defense claimed there was reasonable doubt. provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. Please be respectful of the opinions of others. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review. Note: Comments containing links are not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s