Operating a drone while drunk could become a crime in N.J.

A DJI Mavic Pro Quadcopter drone is seen on flight at the Dronemasters 2017 convention on Sept. 3, 2017 in Berlin, Germany. OMER MESSINGER / GETTY IMAGES

TRENTON, N.J. (WIVB)  — New Jersey lawmakers are moving ahead with legislation that would make it illegal to operate a drone while drunk.

The legislation cleared an Assembly committee on Monday and is up for a vote in the full Senate on Thursday. Both chambers are controlled by Democrats.

The National Conference on State Legislatures says at least 38 states are considering drone legislation this year. U.S. airspace is exclusively regulated by the Federal Aviation Administration. The FAA already has rules in place barring the drunken operation of drones.

New Jersey’s Department of Environmental Protection issued a rule in 2015 barring drones in state parks, but lawmakers say this legislation would be the first statewide law on drones, if enacted.

Lawmakers say the changes are aimed at pre-empting local ordinances that might vary.

“Establishing clear guidelines about how they can and cannot be used can help preserve public safety and prevent people from using them as criminal accessories,” said Democratic Assemblyman Vincent Mazzeo, who co-sponsored the legislation.

The bill specifically would make operating a drone under the influence of alcohol a disorderly persons offense, which carries a sentence of up to six months in prison, a $1,000 fine or both. It also would make using a drone to hunt wildlife and endanger people or property a similar offense.

The legislation also bars using drones to endanger safety at correctional facilities a crime as well as interfering with first responders who are engaged in transport.

A number of states, including Illinois, Michigan and Wisconsin, have offered legislation addressing the use of drones near prisons.

Jonathan Rupprecht, an aviation attorney based in Florida, who also writes on drone law said many states are pursuing their own legislation because of a “lack of enforcement” at the federal level. But, he added, legislating can be difficult because there is not much good data available to base new laws on.

Miles Abrams, an executive with Falcon Drones in Bridgewater, New Jersey, said he opposes the legislation because, though it’s well-intentioned, it overreaches. Specifically, he said he’s unsure how enforcement would work and urged lawmakers to considering narrowing the legislation’s scope.

“Make laws that make for good behavior, not good headlines,” he said.

GOP Gov. Chris Christie does not typically weigh in on pending legislation and his office did not immediately respond to a question about the legislation. Democratic Gov.-elect Phil Murphy’s office also did not immediately respond.

WIVB.com provides commenting to allow for constructive discussion on the stories we cover. In order to comment here, you acknowledge you have read and agreed to our Terms of Service. Commenters who violate these terms, including use of vulgar language or racial slurs, will be banned. Please be respectful of the opinions of others. If you see an inappropriate comment, please flag it for our moderators to review. Note: Comments containing links are not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s